Comparison: GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate

Comparing two leading all-season contenders — Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 and Michelin CrossClimate 2 — across independent tyre tests shows a clear performance split. On our site the Vector Gen‑3 scores 81% while the CrossClimate 2 scores 92%, reflecting Michelin’s consistent top placings in lab and real‑world evaluations. For manufacturer details see Goodyear and Michelin. Neither model has been replaced by a newer generation at the time of these tests.

Summary of measured strengths (tests combined)

• Michelin CrossClimate 2 — dominant in snow: frequent test winner for snow traction, snow braking and snow handling. Also scores very well for dry braking, low rolling resistance and predicted high mileage. Multiple independent tests (Autobild, TyreReviews, Autoklub ČR, ARBÖ) place it in podium positions and often 1st overall.


• Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 — excels in wet performance and aquaplaning resistance, with very good wet braking and handling in several tests. Test reports also highlight balanced all‑round behaviour and comfort, with good predicted mileage and low rolling resistance in some evaluations.

Where each tyre stands out

• Snow & winter capability: CrossClimate 2 is repeatedly rated the best snow performer, often beating specialist winter tyres on braking and traction. The Gen‑3 is competent in snow (good traction and braking) but consistently ranks behind Michelin in snow‑focused metrics.


• Wet performance and aquaplaning: Vector Gen‑3 often scores higher for wet handling, short wet braking distances and aquaplaning resistance. Michelin shows some light weaknesses on wet handling in a few tests despite respectable aquaplaning numbers.


• Dry handling & braking: Michelin typically posts the shortest dry braking distances and very good dry grip; Goodyear is praised for sporty dry handling but sometimes shows longer dry braking in specific reports.


• Economy & comfort: Michelin’s low rolling resistance and predicted mileage are frequent positives; Goodyear is also noted for good comfort and efficient fuel behaviour in multiple tests.

Head‑to‑head in test positions
Across major publications (Autobild series, ADAC, TyreReviews, Autoklub ČR, ARBÖ, Sport Auto), the CrossClimate 2 appears more often in top positions (multiple 1st and podium finishes). The Vector Gen‑3 posts very solid mid‑to‑top finishes (including some 1st places in specific tests) but overall trails Michelin when results are aggregated. In short: Michelin is the more consistent top performer; Goodyear is the stronger wet‑weather specialist and offers excellent balance.

Verdict — strengths & weaknesses

• Michelin CrossClimate 2 (92%): Best pick if your priority is winter/snow capability combined with top dry braking, low rolling resistance and long life. Weaknesses are isolated wet‑handling limits reported in some tests and a higher purchase price.


• Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 (81%): Great all‑round tyre if you want superior wet braking, outstanding aquaplaning resistance and a comfortable ride. Slightly weaker on top‑level snow performance and occasional longer dry braking in some reports.

Recommendation: For a driver who needs class‑leading snow performance and overall test winners, choose the Michelin CrossClimate 2. If you prioritise wet safety, aquaplaning resistance and a balanced all‑season tyre at strong value, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen‑3 remains an excellent alternative.