18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
23
3
4
17
Best position
#1
#4
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
4.3
3.8
1.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
176
99
36
80

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry
Confidence
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dry braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Dry handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dry steering response
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Snow
Confidence
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow traction
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Snow acceleration
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%
Wet
Confidence
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Wet handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Costs
Confidence
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Mileage
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Price/value
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Comfort
Confidence
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Exterior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Comfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Interior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Ice
Confidence
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.