18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
23
17
4
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
3.3
1.7
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
176
80
40
36

Dry

Dry
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry driving behavior
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Snow

Snow
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow traction
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Snow acceleration
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%

Wet

Wet
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Interior noise
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Ice

Ice
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison