18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear UltraGrip 9 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
17
3
14
4
1
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.6
3.7
3.6
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2020
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
41
36
194
40
66

Dry

Dry
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
81%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry performance
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dry driving behavior
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry steering response
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Wet

Wet
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
88%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet performance
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Snow

Snow
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow traction
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow braking
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow handling
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow performance
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Snow cornering
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
80%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Fuel efficiency
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Price/value
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Ice

Ice
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison