18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
4
5
1
24
3
5
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
2.8
1.0
2.7
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
139
27
151
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Dry
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Comfort
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Costs
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store