18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
4
5
3
24
1
5
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
2.8
3.7
2.7
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
139
36
151
27
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Dry
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Comfort
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Costs
Confidence
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store