18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
18
4
24
3
5
Best position
#5
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
5.0
6.1
3.3
2.7
3.7
2.8
Latest test
2024
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
47
40
151
36
139

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison