18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
10
4
4
3
4
5
Best position
#10
#2
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
10.0
6.0
12.0
3.8
1.3
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2026
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
42
109
111
36
23
40
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Falken e.Ziex
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Falken e.Ziex
47%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Dry
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
81%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Falken e.Ziex
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.