Segment
2. Firestone Multihawk 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Firestone Multihawk 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from USA. Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (74%) than Firestone (68%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact and Firestone Multihawk 2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2018 175/65 R14 test, where both the Efficientgrip Compact and the Multihawk 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 81% of Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact has B wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Firestone Multihawk 2 has C rating.
| # | Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
| Firestone Multihawk 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R13 - R15 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Multihawk 2 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Multihawk 2 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 1,9 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Firestone Multihawk 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
