18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

When it comes to getting the best performance out of your vehicle, the choice of tyres is absolutely crucial. We've compiled a comparison between the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance and the Firestone Roadhawk, two popular summer tyres to help you make an informed decision. Please note that the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance model has been replaced with a new and improved version, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2.


Overall, based on our rating, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance received a score of 79% while the Firestone Roadhawk achieved a score of 72%. This points to the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance being a generally better tyre in most conditions.


According to a test performed by Autoklub ČR, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance ranked 8th out of 19 tyres tested for its dry handling. The Firestone Roadhawk, however, ranked 11th, indicating that the Goodyear tyre performed better in dry conditions.


In an ADAC test, the Efficient Grip Performance ranked 12th overall out of 16 tested tyres for its aquaplaning capabilities both longitudinally and across different water depths. On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk performed significantly better in the same test, clinching the 4th position for its dry driving behavior, safety, and wet braking attributes.


Interestingly, in the Autobild test featuring 51 different tyres, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance was ranked 11th for its ability in preventing aquaplaning. Astonishingly, despite the lower overall score, the Firestone Roadhawk shone in this test, obtaining a podium position in 3rd place.


Reflecting on the data, it would appear that while the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance is generally a better performing tyre, the Firestone Roadhawk excels within specific conditions particularly for its dry driving behavior. Visit Firestone’s page for more information about their summer tyres.


To stay up-to-date with each manufacturer's latest releases, updates and specifications, follow our individual links for Goodyear and Firestone.


In conclusion, the choice between the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance and the Firestone Roadhawk will largely depend on your driving style and the conditions you mostly drive under. Be it either rain or shine, both these tyres are robust options warranting your consideration.

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
16
21
13
3
1
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
11.9
4.3
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2023
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
164
123
34
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry driving behavior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison