18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
18
10
24
4
1
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.1
6.0
2.7
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
47
109
151
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store