18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
18
10
1
4
24
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.1
6.0
1.0
3.3
2.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
47
109
66
40
151

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store