18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
18
4
2
5
3
24
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.1
3.3
1.5
2.2
3.7
2.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
40
54
63
36
151

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison