18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
18
3
4
1
24
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
3.7
3.3
1.0
2.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
36
40
66
151

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store