18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

In this article, we will compare two popular summer tyres – the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the Pirelli P ZERO. Both of these tyres have been tested and reviewed by various organizations such as AutoMotorSport, Autobild, ADAC, and Gute-Fahrt. We will discuss their strengths, weaknesses, and overall performance in these tests to help you make an informed decision about which tyre to choose.


The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is a summer tyre with a focus on performance and handling. Made in Slovenia and Germany, it has a 94% rating on our site. It replaced the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and has since been replaced by the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The Asymmetric 5 has performed well in various tests, often securing top positions. Notable strengths include aquaplaning resistance, dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise, comfort, wet braking, and mileage.


On the other hand, the Pirelli P ZERO is an Italian-made summer tyre, boasting an 88% rating. It excels in various features such as dry handling, dry braking, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling. Unlike the Asymmetric 5, the P ZERO has not been replaced by a newer model.


In the AutoMotorSport test featuring 11 tyres, the Asymmetric 5 secured the top position, while the P ZERO came in fourth. The Asymmetric 5 outperformed the P ZERO in almost all categories, including aquaplaning resistance, dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise, and comfort. The P ZERO's only win was in the wet side guide category.


Similarly, in the Autobild test with 53 tyres, the Asymmetric 5 once again ranked first, while the P ZERO came in fourth. The Asymmetric 5 dominated in terms of price/value, wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and mileage. The P ZERO performed well in dry handling, dry braking, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling.


In the ADAC test, the Asymmetric 5 ranked third out of 16 tyres, while the P ZERO came in at twelfth. The Asymmetric 5 performed well in terms of mileage, while the P ZERO excelled in dry braking, dry driving behavior, safety, exterior noise, wet circle cornering, and wet handling.


Last but not least, in the Gute-Fahrt test of 10 tyres, the Asymmetric 5 secured the second position, while the P ZERO came in seventh. The P ZERO showed its strength in wet circle cornering.


In conclusion, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has an overall better performance in mutual tests, showcasing its excellent aquaplaning resistance, dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise, comfort, wet braking, and mileage. Meanwhile, the Pirelli P ZERO performs well in dry handling, dry braking, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling. Ultimately, the choice between these two tyres will depend on your specific needs and preferences, but both options offer good performance in their respective strengths.

Test Profile

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Pirelli
P ZERO
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
15
17
3
2
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
2.3
6.1
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2022
2020
2025
2025
Available sizes
187
329
34
23

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Pirelli P ZERO
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
86%
Pirelli P ZERO
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Pirelli P ZERO
67%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Wet braking
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Pirelli P ZERO
83%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet handling
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
92%
Pirelli P ZERO
94%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Pirelli P ZERO
97%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
85%
Pirelli P ZERO
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Pirelli P ZERO
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Pirelli P ZERO
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Pirelli P ZERO
94%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Pirelli P ZERO
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Pirelli P ZERO
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Offroad

Offroad
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
92%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Pirelli P ZERO
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
75%
Pirelli P ZERO
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Comfort
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
80%
Pirelli P ZERO
85%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
77%
Pirelli P ZERO
53%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
66%
Pirelli P ZERO
51%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Pirelli P ZERO
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison