18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

In this article, we will compare two popular summer tyres – the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the Pirelli P ZERO. Both of these tyres have been tested and reviewed by various organizations such as AutoMotorSport, Autobild, ADAC, and Gute-Fahrt. We will discuss their strengths, weaknesses, and overall performance in these tests to help you make an informed decision about which tyre to choose.


The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is a summer tyre with a focus on performance and handling. Made in Slovenia and Germany, it has a 94% rating on our site. It replaced the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 and has since been replaced by the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. The Asymmetric 5 has performed well in various tests, often securing top positions. Notable strengths include aquaplaning resistance, dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise, comfort, wet braking, and mileage.


On the other hand, the Pirelli P ZERO is an Italian-made summer tyre, boasting an 88% rating. It excels in various features such as dry handling, dry braking, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling. Unlike the Asymmetric 5, the P ZERO has not been replaced by a newer model.


In the AutoMotorSport test featuring 11 tyres, the Asymmetric 5 secured the top position, while the P ZERO came in fourth. The Asymmetric 5 outperformed the P ZERO in almost all categories, including aquaplaning resistance, dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise, and comfort. The P ZERO's only win was in the wet side guide category.


Similarly, in the Autobild test with 53 tyres, the Asymmetric 5 once again ranked first, while the P ZERO came in fourth. The Asymmetric 5 dominated in terms of price/value, wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and mileage. The P ZERO performed well in dry handling, dry braking, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling.


In the ADAC test, the Asymmetric 5 ranked third out of 16 tyres, while the P ZERO came in at twelfth. The Asymmetric 5 performed well in terms of mileage, while the P ZERO excelled in dry braking, dry driving behavior, safety, exterior noise, wet circle cornering, and wet handling.


Last but not least, in the Gute-Fahrt test of 10 tyres, the Asymmetric 5 secured the second position, while the P ZERO came in seventh. The P ZERO showed its strength in wet circle cornering.


In conclusion, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has an overall better performance in mutual tests, showcasing its excellent aquaplaning resistance, dry braking, dry steering response, exterior noise, comfort, wet braking, and mileage. Meanwhile, the Pirelli P ZERO performs well in dry handling, dry braking, wet braking, wet circle cornering, and wet handling. Ultimately, the choice between these two tyres will depend on your specific needs and preferences, but both options offer good performance in their respective strengths.

Test Profile

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Pirelli
P ZERO
Falken
Azenis FK510
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
15
17
29
6
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#3
Average position
2.3
6.1
5.4
4.7
Latest test
2022
2020
2022
2026
Available sizes
187
330
125
146

Wet

Wet
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Pirelli P ZERO
88%
Falken Azenis FK510
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
86%
Pirelli P ZERO
78%
Falken Azenis FK510
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Pirelli P ZERO
67%
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet braking
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Pirelli P ZERO
83%
Falken Azenis FK510
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet handling
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
92%
Pirelli P ZERO
94%
Falken Azenis FK510
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet circle cornering
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Pirelli P ZERO
97%
Falken Azenis FK510
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet side guide
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
85%
Pirelli P ZERO
100%
Falken Azenis FK510
67%
Wet performance
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
79%
Pirelli P ZERO
90%
Falken Azenis FK510
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%

Dry

Dry
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Pirelli P ZERO
90%
Falken Azenis FK510
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Pirelli P ZERO
91%
Falken Azenis FK510
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
90%
Pirelli P ZERO
94%
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dry lane changing
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Pirelli P ZERO
85%
Falken Azenis FK510
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Dry steering response
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
87%
Pirelli P ZERO
85%
Falken Azenis FK510
55%
Dry performance
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Pirelli P ZERO
97%
Falken Azenis FK510
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%
Dry driving behavior
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
88%
Pirelli P ZERO
91%
Falken Azenis FK510
75%

Offroad

Offroad
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
92%

Comfort

Comfort
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Pirelli P ZERO
73%
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
75%
Pirelli P ZERO
74%
Falken Azenis FK510
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Comfort
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
80%
Pirelli P ZERO
85%
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Interior noise
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
78%
Pirelli P ZERO
69%
Falken Azenis FK510
73%

Costs

Costs
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
77%
Pirelli P ZERO
53%
Falken Azenis FK510
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
66%
Pirelli P ZERO
51%
Falken Azenis FK510
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Mileage
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
94%
Pirelli P ZERO
64%
Falken Azenis FK510
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Fuel efficiency
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
84%
Pirelli P ZERO
69%
Falken Azenis FK510
80%
Price/value
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
76%
Pirelli P ZERO
23%
Falken Azenis FK510
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison