Segment
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium2. Continental VanContact Winter Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Goodyear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Continental (83%). But when it comes to comparing Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 and Continental VanContact Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the Cargo UltraGrip 2 and the VanContact Winter were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 60% of Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 has C wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Continental VanContact Winter has B rating.
| # | Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2
| Continental VanContact Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Premium2. Continental VanContact Winter Premium
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Still recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2,8 | 3,9 | 3,7 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Cargo UltraGrip 2 Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
| Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||