18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodride SW608 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodride
SW608
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
3
1
Best position
#11
#2
#1
Average position
31.5
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
66
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Goodride SW608
56%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodride SW608
39%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodride SW608
31%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodride SW608
65%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodride SW608
74%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodride SW608
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Goodride SW608
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Exterior noise
Goodride SW608
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store