18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodride SW608 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Goodride
SW608
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
6
3
3
Best position
#11
#2
#1
Average position
31.5
3.7
1.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
66
36
23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodride SW608
31%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Wet braking
Goodride SW608
56%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodride SW608
39%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Wet handling
Goodride SW608
65%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dry braking
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dry handling
Goodride SW608
74%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolling resistance
Goodride SW608
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Comfort
Goodride SW608
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Exterior noise
Goodride SW608
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store