18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

When it comes to tyre tests, the Fulda SportControl 2 and Continental PremiumContact 7 are two notable products to consider. By diving deeper into various tests and reviews, we can piece together a succinct comparison between these two models.


The Fulda SportControl 2, which hasn't been replaced by a newer tyre, offers secure driving characteristics on dry surfaces and promises a low fuel consumption due to its light tyre weight. The performance on dry surfaces is strong, but the comfort level may be affected slightly. However, it shows weaknesses in wet conditions and its predicted service life is satisfactory but not stellar. In mutual tests, the Fulda SportControl 2 didn't perform as well as the Continental PremiumContact 7. For instance, in the Autobild test out of 50 tyres, the Fulda SportControl 2 ranked 18th, while in the ADAC test featuring 16 tyres, it managed a 7th position. Overall, the tyre still carries a respectable rating of 69% on our scale.


On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 7, made in various European countries, including France, Slovakia, Germany, and Czech Republic, offers exceptionally good results. This summer tyre provides high safety reserves in aquaplaning situations, short braking distances, dynamic handling, a convincing mileage, and very good price-performance ratio. Even though it's pricier, the performance justifies the cost. It's particularly notable in comfort, dry handling and braking, and wet handling and braking. In the Autobild test, this tyre achieved 5th position out of 50, and in the ADAC tests, it grabbed the top spot. Consequently, it receives a strong rating of 97% on our scale.


In summation, although both products from Fulda and Continental have their strengths and weaknesses, it's clear that the Continental PremiumContact 7 outperforms the Fulda SportControl 2 in both individual performance and mutual tests. The margin of difference is substantial enough to lean towards the Continental, but baring in mind the potential cost implications.

Test Profile

Fulda
SportControl 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
16
26
3
Best position
#3
#1
#2
Average position
11.7
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
91
66
34

Wet

Wet
Fulda SportControl 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Fulda SportControl 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Fulda SportControl 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Fulda SportControl 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Fulda SportControl 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Fulda SportControl 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Fulda SportControl 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Fulda SportControl 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Fulda SportControl 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Fulda SportControl 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Fulda SportControl 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Fulda SportControl 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Fulda SportControl 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
Fulda SportControl 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Fulda SportControl 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Fulda SportControl 2
57%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Fulda SportControl 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison