18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

When it comes to tyre choice for your vehicle, it's important to consider all factors. We have a comparative analysis here for two popular summer tyres, the Firestone Roadhawk and the Michelin Primacy 4+. Both offer unique selling points, but also come with their own set of pros and cons.


The Firestone Roadhawk tyre, rated 59% by our experts, boasts impressive strengths, including dynamic handling and short dry braking distances. Its sporty profile and valuable price-to-performance ratio were spoken about positively in the Offroad 2018 review. However, its increased rolling noise was flagged as a potential issue. According to mutual test data from Autobild, the Firestone Roadhawk was positioned 12th out of 55 tyres, which is a commendable result. However, it trailed in Autoklub ČR and ADAC's ranking, placing 11th out of 19 and 20th out of 50 respectively.


On the other hand, we have the Michelin Primacy 4+ tyre, which we rated at 77%. This tyre takes a spot in the touring subtype and it is the successor of the Michelin Primacy 4 and Michelin Primacy 3. According to Autobild 2024, this tyre is very balanced, commendably performing not only on dry but also wet surfaces. Furthermore, the Michelin Primacy 4+ has an excellent ecological footprint due to its longevity, which was rated as the best by the aforementioned test. The Primacy 4+ has no noteworthy weaknesses and its mutual test results outshine the Firestone Roadhawk, ranking 5th with Autobild, and reaching an impressive 2nd and 3rd place with Autoklub ČR and ADAC respectively.


In conclusion, each tyre brings something different to the table. The Firestone Roadhawk stands out for its sporty handling, valuable price-to-performance ratio and good dry surface performance. But, it faces some issues, particularly with increased rolling noise and lesser performance on wet roads. The Michelin Primacy 4+ edges ahead overall with its ability to deliver a top-notch performance on both dry and wet surfaces, superior longevity and balanced delivery of features, positioning it very highly in mutual tests.


Please note, individual driving preferences and requirements can influence the ideal choice between these two options. Hence, we recommend considering all the mentioned factors before making a final tyre selection.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
21
13
1
Best position
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
4.3
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
164
123
64

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison