18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

In this comparison, we are looking at two summer tyres: the Firestone Roadhawk and the Kumho Ecsta PS71. Both tyres are popular choices for drivers seeking performance, safety, and value. Here, we will highlight their strengths and weaknesses based on various tests to help you make an informed decision.


According to our ratings, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores a 79%, while the Firestone Roadhawk comes in slightly lower at 71%. This difference is reflected in the various tests carried out by different organizations.


In the Autobild test, the Firestone Roadhawk placed 13th out of 53 tyres, while the Kumho Ecsta PS71 landed in the 18th position. Despite being lower in the ranking, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was praised for its consistent high-performance, good handling qualities, and short wet and dry braking distances. It also offers a fair price, but at the cost of increased road noise.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk received a lower overall ranking in the Autobild 2020 test due to its weaknesses on dry roads, slightly increased wear, and very poor performance on wet surfaces. However, it does have the advantage of lower fuel consumption.


In the ADAC test, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 vastly outperformed the Firestone Roadhawk, placing 3rd out of 17 tyres. It was particularly praised for its performance in aquaplaning tests, both cross and longitudinal. The tyre demonstrated excellent balance, especially on wet surfaces, and had no significant weaknesses.


In contrast, the Firestone Roadhawk secured a much lower position, finishing 17th in the ADAC test. The tyre showed poor results in most of the evaluated criteria.


Verdict


Overall, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is the superior tyre in this comparison. It consistently performs well in various tests, with a focus on balance, wet surface handling, and aquaplaning resistance. Its only notable drawback is increased road noise, which may be a trade-off for its performance capabilities.


Conversely, the Firestone Roadhawk has some significant weaknesses, particularly its poor performance on wet surfaces and increased wear. However, it does excel in fuel efficiency, making it an option for drivers looking for an eco-friendly tyre.


For more information on these tyres, you can visit their respective manufacturers' websites: Firestone and Kumho.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Number of tests
21
15
9
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
11.9
9.0
5.8
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
164
225
92

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
51%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
84%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Wet Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Wet Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
18%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Wet Circle Cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
94%
Aquaplaning Cross
Firestone Roadhawk
54%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
94%
Dry Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
88%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Dry Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
88%
Comfort & Noise
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
68%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Noise Exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
68%
Noise Interior
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Economy
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Fuel Efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2021225/50 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison