18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

In this comparison, we are looking at two summer tyres: the Firestone Roadhawk and the Kumho Ecsta PS71. Both tyres are popular choices for drivers seeking performance, safety, and value. Here, we will highlight their strengths and weaknesses based on various tests to help you make an informed decision.


According to our ratings, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores a 79%, while the Firestone Roadhawk comes in slightly lower at 71%. This difference is reflected in the various tests carried out by different organizations.


In the Autobild test, the Firestone Roadhawk placed 13th out of 53 tyres, while the Kumho Ecsta PS71 landed in the 18th position. Despite being lower in the ranking, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was praised for its consistent high-performance, good handling qualities, and short wet and dry braking distances. It also offers a fair price, but at the cost of increased road noise.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk received a lower overall ranking in the Autobild 2020 test due to its weaknesses on dry roads, slightly increased wear, and very poor performance on wet surfaces. However, it does have the advantage of lower fuel consumption.


In the ADAC test, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 vastly outperformed the Firestone Roadhawk, placing 3rd out of 17 tyres. It was particularly praised for its performance in aquaplaning tests, both cross and longitudinal. The tyre demonstrated excellent balance, especially on wet surfaces, and had no significant weaknesses.


In contrast, the Firestone Roadhawk secured a much lower position, finishing 17th in the ADAC test. The tyre showed poor results in most of the evaluated criteria.


Verdict


Overall, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is the superior tyre in this comparison. It consistently performs well in various tests, with a focus on balance, wet surface handling, and aquaplaning resistance. Its only notable drawback is increased road noise, which may be a trade-off for its performance capabilities.


Conversely, the Firestone Roadhawk has some significant weaknesses, particularly its poor performance on wet surfaces and increased wear. However, it does excel in fuel efficiency, making it an option for drivers looking for an eco-friendly tyre.


For more information on these tyres, you can visit their respective manufacturers' websites: Firestone and Kumho.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
21
15
1
5
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
9.0
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
164
225
64
63

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison