18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

In this comparison, we are looking at two summer tyres: the Firestone Roadhawk and the Kumho Ecsta PS71. Both tyres are popular choices for drivers seeking performance, safety, and value. Here, we will highlight their strengths and weaknesses based on various tests to help you make an informed decision.


According to our ratings, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores a 79%, while the Firestone Roadhawk comes in slightly lower at 71%. This difference is reflected in the various tests carried out by different organizations.


In the Autobild test, the Firestone Roadhawk placed 13th out of 53 tyres, while the Kumho Ecsta PS71 landed in the 18th position. Despite being lower in the ranking, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was praised for its consistent high-performance, good handling qualities, and short wet and dry braking distances. It also offers a fair price, but at the cost of increased road noise.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk received a lower overall ranking in the Autobild 2020 test due to its weaknesses on dry roads, slightly increased wear, and very poor performance on wet surfaces. However, it does have the advantage of lower fuel consumption.


In the ADAC test, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 vastly outperformed the Firestone Roadhawk, placing 3rd out of 17 tyres. It was particularly praised for its performance in aquaplaning tests, both cross and longitudinal. The tyre demonstrated excellent balance, especially on wet surfaces, and had no significant weaknesses.


In contrast, the Firestone Roadhawk secured a much lower position, finishing 17th in the ADAC test. The tyre showed poor results in most of the evaluated criteria.


Verdict


Overall, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is the superior tyre in this comparison. It consistently performs well in various tests, with a focus on balance, wet surface handling, and aquaplaning resistance. Its only notable drawback is increased road noise, which may be a trade-off for its performance capabilities.


Conversely, the Firestone Roadhawk has some significant weaknesses, particularly its poor performance on wet surfaces and increased wear. However, it does excel in fuel efficiency, making it an option for drivers looking for an eco-friendly tyre.


For more information on these tyres, you can visit their respective manufacturers' websites: Firestone and Kumho.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
21
15
23
24
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
9.0
3.3
2.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
164
225
176
302

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Wet performance
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Dry performance
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Fuel efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison