18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

In this comparison, we are looking at two summer tyres: the Firestone Roadhawk and the Kumho Ecsta PS71. Both tyres are popular choices for drivers seeking performance, safety, and value. Here, we will highlight their strengths and weaknesses based on various tests to help you make an informed decision.


According to our ratings, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores a 79%, while the Firestone Roadhawk comes in slightly lower at 71%. This difference is reflected in the various tests carried out by different organizations.


In the Autobild test, the Firestone Roadhawk placed 13th out of 53 tyres, while the Kumho Ecsta PS71 landed in the 18th position. Despite being lower in the ranking, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 was praised for its consistent high-performance, good handling qualities, and short wet and dry braking distances. It also offers a fair price, but at the cost of increased road noise.


On the other hand, the Firestone Roadhawk received a lower overall ranking in the Autobild 2020 test due to its weaknesses on dry roads, slightly increased wear, and very poor performance on wet surfaces. However, it does have the advantage of lower fuel consumption.


In the ADAC test, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 vastly outperformed the Firestone Roadhawk, placing 3rd out of 17 tyres. It was particularly praised for its performance in aquaplaning tests, both cross and longitudinal. The tyre demonstrated excellent balance, especially on wet surfaces, and had no significant weaknesses.


In contrast, the Firestone Roadhawk secured a much lower position, finishing 17th in the ADAC test. The tyre showed poor results in most of the evaluated criteria.


Verdict


Overall, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is the superior tyre in this comparison. It consistently performs well in various tests, with a focus on balance, wet surface handling, and aquaplaning resistance. Its only notable drawback is increased road noise, which may be a trade-off for its performance capabilities.


Conversely, the Firestone Roadhawk has some significant weaknesses, particularly its poor performance on wet surfaces and increased wear. However, it does excel in fuel efficiency, making it an option for drivers looking for an eco-friendly tyre.


For more information on these tyres, you can visit their respective manufacturers' websites: Firestone and Kumho.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
21
15
33
Best position
#2
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
9.0
4.1
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
164
225
658

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
85%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Wet Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Wet Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Wet Circle Cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
93%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
75%
Aquaplaning Cross
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
92%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Dry Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
89%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
93%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Bridgestone Turanza T005
95%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Dry Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
88%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
94%
Dry Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
95%
Comfort & Noise
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Bridgestone Turanza T005
55%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Noise Exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
57%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
39%
Noise Interior
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
71%
Economy
Firestone Roadhawk
82%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho Ecsta PS71
58%
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Rolling Resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
32%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
99%
Fuel Efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2021225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison