18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

When comparing Firestone Roadhawk and Kleber Dynaxer HP4, it's evident that both summer tyres bring a unique set of strengths to the table. We have considered multiple tyre tests, including Autobild, ADAC and ACE evaluations, among others.


Following our evaluation, we have given Firestone Roadhawk a 72% rating. One of its standout features is its excellent handling on both dry and wet surfaces, as echoed in Autobild's test. Firestone tyre also shone in the ACE test in terms of rolling resistance. However, multiple tests highlighted weaknesses on wet surfaces and...a slightly higher tyre noise. Also, it didn’t perform equally well on dry surfaces according to the autobild 2021 test. Given the superior performance on dry and wet surfaces and its efficiency, it can be concluded that Firestone Roadhawk is a reliable tyre for summer use.


Considering the Kleber Dynaxer HP4, our rating stands at 82%. This tyre impresses with good environmental balance, lifespan, tread wear and efficiency as reflected in the autobild 2024 test. While its performance on dry surfaces and exterior noise levels were its strongest suits in the Autobild tests. It stands ahead of the Firestone Roadhawk with the 11th position in the ADAC tyre test, compared to Firestone's 17th place. However, the tyre's performance took a hit on wet surfaces, according to autobild 2024 and adac 2021. Hence, if you prioritize comfort, exterior noise, and better performance on dry surfaces, the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 can be a good choice.


In summary, with respective strengths and weaknesses, both the Firestone Roadhawk and the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 demonstrate solid performances. However, the overall tests results indicate that the Kleber Dynaxer HP4 might outshine its competitor. Despite some weaknesses, such as performance on wet surfaces, its stronger points tilt the balance in its favour. Hence, if you can overlook the minor shortcomings on wet surfaces, Kleber Dynaxer HP4 can potentially be a more fitting choice for summer.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
21
11
6
3
26
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
11.9
11.6
4.7
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2024
2024
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
164
121
146
40
66

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet performance
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry performance
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison