18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
21
4
3
24
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
3.3
3.7
2.7
1.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
165
40
36
151
23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
62%
Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store