18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

When discussing tyres, it's important to compare top brands like the Firestone Roadhawk and the Continental PremiumContact 7. Both are excellent summer tyres with differing strengths and weaknesses.


The Firestone Roadhawk is rated at 57%, and has been replaced by a newer model, the Firestone Roadhawk 2. Autobild placed the Roadhawk 31st out of 50 in a recent test. However, it is praised for its dynamic handling, short dry braking distances, and good price-performance ratio. Despite these strengths, it has been noted for its increased rolling noise, which could be a disadvantage for some drivers.


On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 7, replacing models such as the Continental PremiumContact 6 and Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, scores a noteworthy 97% in our rating. It was placed 5th out of 50 in the Autobild test and obtained the top rank in the Autoklub test. This tyre stands out for its exemplary performance on both wet and dry surfaces, featuring the shortest wet and dry braking distances. Other top features include wet handling, comfort, and earlier models' sporty dynamic handling. The PremiumContact 7 however, is criticized for its higher price, which might not suit all budgets.


Overall, if you're looking for a tyre with excellent performance and don't mind paying a premium for it, the Continental PremiumContact 7 by Continental is a perfect choice. However, if you're after a sporty handling and a good price-performance ratio, consider the Firestone Roadhawk from Firestone, keeping in mind its newer variant may offer improvements. As always, the 'best' tyre depends significantly on individual needs and preferences.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
21
26
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
11.9
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
164
66
34

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison