18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Let's have a closer look at the performance, pros, and cons of two popular summer tyres; the Firestone Roadhawk and the BFGoodrich Advantage. These tyres are products of renowned manufacturers, Firestone and BFGoodrich respectively.


The Firestone Roadhawk, in our rating, scored a decent 72%. It stands out for its sporty dynamic handling and impressive dry braking, even earning the best grade for efficiency and low wear in some tests. However, it has been shown to struggle a bit on wet surfaces and has come in 10th position in both the Autobild and ADAC tests among 53 and 16 tyres respectively. Additionally, it has been criticized for its higher road noise, a factor that may affect comfort during long drives.


Switching gears to the BFGoodrich Advantage, we see a slightly higher overall rating at 76%. This tyre excels notably in comfort and dry handling. Its positioning in the mutual tests conducted by Autobild and ADAC puts it slightly behind the Firestone Roadhawk, standing at 18th and 10th positions amongst 53 and 16 tyres respectively. However, it too shares a weakness in wet handling and has a tendency to understeer in such conditions. Yet, it has a plus side, as it has a pleasant, quiet rolling noise and lower rolling resistance compared to its counterpart.


Summing up the overall test results, it's clear that both these tyres have their own strengths. If your preference lies with aggressive, sporty handling and optimal performance on dry conditions, then the Firestone Roadhawk has the edge. However, it's worth noting that if ride comfort, quietness and dry handling rank high on your list, the BFGoodrich Advantage may be the better choice for you. It should be mentioned that both tyres display some weaknesses in wet conditions.


Finally, our verdict is based on a multitude of performance metrics and these tyres offer strong competition to each other. Depending on your specific needs and driving conditions, you would be wise to consider these variables when choosing between the Firestone Roadhawk and the BFGoodrich Advantage.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
21
14
15
14
3
Best position
#2
#8
#2
#2
#2
Average position
11.9
13.4
9.0
5.5
3.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
164
153
225
706
40

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet performance
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry performance
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
28%
Fuel efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison