18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Let's have a closer look at the performance, pros, and cons of two popular summer tyres; the Firestone Roadhawk and the BFGoodrich Advantage. These tyres are products of renowned manufacturers, Firestone and BFGoodrich respectively.


The Firestone Roadhawk, in our rating, scored a decent 72%. It stands out for its sporty dynamic handling and impressive dry braking, even earning the best grade for efficiency and low wear in some tests. However, it has been shown to struggle a bit on wet surfaces and has come in 10th position in both the Autobild and ADAC tests among 53 and 16 tyres respectively. Additionally, it has been criticized for its higher road noise, a factor that may affect comfort during long drives.


Switching gears to the BFGoodrich Advantage, we see a slightly higher overall rating at 76%. This tyre excels notably in comfort and dry handling. Its positioning in the mutual tests conducted by Autobild and ADAC puts it slightly behind the Firestone Roadhawk, standing at 18th and 10th positions amongst 53 and 16 tyres respectively. However, it too shares a weakness in wet handling and has a tendency to understeer in such conditions. Yet, it has a plus side, as it has a pleasant, quiet rolling noise and lower rolling resistance compared to its counterpart.


Summing up the overall test results, it's clear that both these tyres have their own strengths. If your preference lies with aggressive, sporty handling and optimal performance on dry conditions, then the Firestone Roadhawk has the edge. However, it's worth noting that if ride comfort, quietness and dry handling rank high on your list, the BFGoodrich Advantage may be the better choice for you. It should be mentioned that both tyres display some weaknesses in wet conditions.


Finally, our verdict is based on a multitude of performance metrics and these tyres offer strong competition to each other. Depending on your specific needs and driving conditions, you would be wise to consider these variables when choosing between the Firestone Roadhawk and the BFGoodrich Advantage.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
21
14
10
Best position
#2
#8
#2
Average position
11.9
13.4
6.0
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
164
153
104

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Wet Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Wet Circle Cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning Cross
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
57%
Dry Performance
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich Advantage
74%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Firestone Roadhawk
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Dry Handling
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
92%
Comfort & Noise
Firestone Roadhawk
56%
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich Advantage
82%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Firestone Roadhawk
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Economy
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison