18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Let's have a closer look at the performance, pros, and cons of two popular summer tyres; the Firestone Roadhawk and the BFGoodrich Advantage. These tyres are products of renowned manufacturers, Firestone and BFGoodrich respectively.


The Firestone Roadhawk, in our rating, scored a decent 72%. It stands out for its sporty dynamic handling and impressive dry braking, even earning the best grade for efficiency and low wear in some tests. However, it has been shown to struggle a bit on wet surfaces and has come in 10th position in both the Autobild and ADAC tests among 53 and 16 tyres respectively. Additionally, it has been criticized for its higher road noise, a factor that may affect comfort during long drives.


Switching gears to the BFGoodrich Advantage, we see a slightly higher overall rating at 76%. This tyre excels notably in comfort and dry handling. Its positioning in the mutual tests conducted by Autobild and ADAC puts it slightly behind the Firestone Roadhawk, standing at 18th and 10th positions amongst 53 and 16 tyres respectively. However, it too shares a weakness in wet handling and has a tendency to understeer in such conditions. Yet, it has a plus side, as it has a pleasant, quiet rolling noise and lower rolling resistance compared to its counterpart.


Summing up the overall test results, it's clear that both these tyres have their own strengths. If your preference lies with aggressive, sporty handling and optimal performance on dry conditions, then the Firestone Roadhawk has the edge. However, it's worth noting that if ride comfort, quietness and dry handling rank high on your list, the BFGoodrich Advantage may be the better choice for you. It should be mentioned that both tyres display some weaknesses in wet conditions.


Finally, our verdict is based on a multitude of performance metrics and these tyres offer strong competition to each other. Depending on your specific needs and driving conditions, you would be wise to consider these variables when choosing between the Firestone Roadhawk and the BFGoodrich Advantage.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
21
14
3
3
Best position
#2
#8
#2
#2
Average position
11.9
13.4
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
164
153
40
34

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet performance
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry performance
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison