18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Let's have a closer look at the performance, pros, and cons of two popular summer tyres; the Firestone Roadhawk and the BFGoodrich Advantage. These tyres are products of renowned manufacturers, Firestone and BFGoodrich respectively.


The Firestone Roadhawk, in our rating, scored a decent 72%. It stands out for its sporty dynamic handling and impressive dry braking, even earning the best grade for efficiency and low wear in some tests. However, it has been shown to struggle a bit on wet surfaces and has come in 10th position in both the Autobild and ADAC tests among 53 and 16 tyres respectively. Additionally, it has been criticized for its higher road noise, a factor that may affect comfort during long drives.


Switching gears to the BFGoodrich Advantage, we see a slightly higher overall rating at 76%. This tyre excels notably in comfort and dry handling. Its positioning in the mutual tests conducted by Autobild and ADAC puts it slightly behind the Firestone Roadhawk, standing at 18th and 10th positions amongst 53 and 16 tyres respectively. However, it too shares a weakness in wet handling and has a tendency to understeer in such conditions. Yet, it has a plus side, as it has a pleasant, quiet rolling noise and lower rolling resistance compared to its counterpart.


Summing up the overall test results, it's clear that both these tyres have their own strengths. If your preference lies with aggressive, sporty handling and optimal performance on dry conditions, then the Firestone Roadhawk has the edge. However, it's worth noting that if ride comfort, quietness and dry handling rank high on your list, the BFGoodrich Advantage may be the better choice for you. It should be mentioned that both tyres display some weaknesses in wet conditions.


Finally, our verdict is based on a multitude of performance metrics and these tyres offer strong competition to each other. Depending on your specific needs and driving conditions, you would be wise to consider these variables when choosing between the Firestone Roadhawk and the BFGoodrich Advantage.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
21
14
16
4
26
Best position
#2
#8
#3
#3
#1
Average position
11.9
13.4
5.5
12.0
2.2
Latest test
2024
2026
2023
2025
2026
Available sizes
164
153
153
111
66

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Fuel efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison