18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

The Firestone Roadhawk 2 and Michelin Primacy 4+ are notable competitors in the summer tyre market, with a series of tests indicating their strengths and weaknesses.


The Firestone Roadhawk 2, manufactured in Italy, replaced the initial Roadhawk model. The tyre received a 74% rating from our platform. It secured the 6th and 5th positions in the Autobild and Autozeitung trials respectively, faring exceptionally well in aquaplaning tests. Regardless of these strengths, recommended usage for electric vehicles and good driving dynamics, there was no specific reference to a pronounced weakness in the autobild 2025 report. For more information, explore the Firestone Roadhawk 2 tyre details.


On the contrary, the touring subtype tyre, Michelin Primacy 4+, made in Spain, replaced the Michelin Primacy 4 and 3 models. The Michelin Primacy 5 is its successor. Our platform gave it a 76% score, outcompeting the Firestone Roadhawk 2. It achieved 4th and 7th positions in tests by Autobild and Autozeitung respectively. Its main attributes were short braking distances, positive driving dynamics, including good handling, comfort, low rolling resistance, and external noise. More on Michelin Primacy 4+ tyre details.


In mutual evaluations, Michelin Primacy 4+ generally outperforms the Firestone Roadhawk 2, however, your selection should be based on specific requirements. Visit Firestone and Michelin for more options from these manufacturers.


In conclusion, both tyres have their own strengths and reported good performance in various tests. Firestone Roadhawk 2 offers excellent resistance to aquaplaning while Michelin Primacy 4+ provides good comfort, low noise, and rolling resistance. However, Michelin Primacy 4+ slightly surpasses the Firestone Roadhawk 2 in overall performance.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
6
13
3
3
5
26
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
4.7
4.3
3.3
3.7
2.2
2.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
146
123
40
34
63
66

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry lane changing
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison