Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Firestone (68%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 77% compared to 74% of the Firestone Roadhawk 2. The first tyre test of Firestone Roadhawk 2 was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2024 225/45 R17 test, where both the Roadhawk 2 and the Turanza 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Firestone Roadhawk 2 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Bridgestone Turanza 6 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Roadhawk 2 is made in Italy and Turanza 6 is made in Spain.
| # | Firestone Roadhawk 2
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended
2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firestone Roadhawk 2 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 Rating: Recommended for economical driving | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||