18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

This comparison looks at the Firestone Multiseason 2 and the Toyo Celsius AS2 across independent tyre tests and lab results to determine which performs better overall. Both tyres are full product entries on our site — see the Firestone page at /firestone-multiseason-2 and the Toyo page at /toyo-celsius-as2. Manufacturer pages: Firestone and Toyo. Neither model is listed as replaced by a newer version.


At a glance, our scores give the Firestone Multiseason 2 a slight edge (56% vs 54%). Test rankings consistently place Firestone ahead or level with Toyo: in Autobild group tests Firestone typically finished one or more positions higher (e.g. 11th vs 12th in a 15‑tyre test), and in ADAC the Multiseason 2 ranked 8th of 16 compared with the Celsius AS2 at 11th. Across multiple Autobild and ADAC reviews the pattern is the same — Firestone is generally stronger in winter and wet performance, Toyo is closer on comfort and value.


Firestone Multiseason 2 — strengths & weaknesses


  • Strengths: Very good wet handling lap, excellent grip in snow tests, short snow and wet braking distances in several tests, and consistently low rolling resistance which supports fuel economy and mileage.

  • Weaknesses: Extended dry braking distances in some tests, only moderate lateral control on snow, and limited safety reserves in corner aquaplaning. Comfort is slightly below average versus premium all‑season/winter rivals.

  • Test highlights: Praised repeatedly for snow braking and low roll resistance; placed higher than Toyo in most comparative rankings.


Toyo Celsius AS2 — strengths & weaknesses


  • Strengths: Good value for money, high mileage potential, comfortable ride and low exterior noise in several Autobild runs, and strong aquaplaning resistance/frame in some cross tests.

  • Weaknesses: Weaker wet and winter grip compared with Firestone — testers report longer wet braking, understeer on wet and snowy surfaces, and overall average winter qualities. Some reports also note higher rolling resistance in certain seasons.

  • Test highlights: Often singled out for comfort, noise and cost‑effectiveness; however it falls behind Firestone where wet grip and snow handling matter most.


Mutual test positions & overall verdict
When you aggregate the results, Firestone holds a narrow but meaningful advantage in performance‑critical categories (wet braking, snow grip and rolling resistance) while Toyo scores better on comfort, noise and price/value. In head‑to‑head rankings across Autobild and ADAC test portfolios Firestone more often finishes ahead. If your priority is winter and wet performance and slightly better efficiency, the Firestone Multiseason 2 is the better choice. If budget, ride comfort and aquaplaning confidence are more important, the Toyo Celsius AS2 is a compelling value option.


For full test breakdowns and detailed scorecards, visit each tyre page: Firestone Multiseason 2 and Toyo Celsius AS2. Manufacturer info: Firestone and Toyo.

Test Profile

Firestone
Multiseason 2
Toyo
Celsius AS2
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Number of tests
13
14
28
Best position
#6
#7
#1
Average position
10.9
11.6
3.9
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
61
109
210

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Toyo Celsius AS2
65%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
84%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Wet Braking
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Toyo Celsius AS2
51%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
74%
Wet Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Toyo Celsius AS2
52%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
88%
Wet Circle Cornering
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Toyo Celsius AS2
56%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
85%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Firestone Multiseason 2
58%
Toyo Celsius AS2
78%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
83%
Aquaplaning Cross
Firestone Multiseason 2
55%
Toyo Celsius AS2
90%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
90%
Dry Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
60%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Toyo Celsius AS2
68%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
77%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Dry Braking
Firestone Multiseason 2
55%
Toyo Celsius AS2
67%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
63%
Dry Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Toyo Celsius AS2
68%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
90%
Snow Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Toyo Celsius AS2
67%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
87%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Snow Braking
Firestone Multiseason 2
81%
Toyo Celsius AS2
77%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
90%
Snow Traction
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Toyo Celsius AS2
60%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
90%
Snow Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Toyo Celsius AS2
64%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
83%
Snow Circle Cornering
Firestone Multiseason 2
56%
Toyo Celsius AS2
66%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
85%
Comfort & Noise
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Toyo Celsius AS2
71%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
78%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Noise Exterior
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Toyo Celsius AS2
68%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
73%
Ride Comfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
56%
Toyo Celsius AS2
73%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
82%
Economy
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Toyo Celsius AS2
78%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
78%
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rolling Resistance
Firestone Multiseason 2
92%
Toyo Celsius AS2
67%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
67%
Mileage
Firestone Multiseason 2
60%
Toyo Celsius AS2
88%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
88%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
All season
2023225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2022195/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison