18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data


Let's take a closer look at two all-round tyres manufactured by respected brands, the Firestone Multiseason 2 and the Continental AllSeasonContact. Both were appreciated by various reviewers, but their ratings in our own tests were quite different, with the Firestone tyre scoring 63% and the Continental one 75%.


Made in Italy, the Firestone Multiseason 2 is a winter tyre that has not been superseded by a newer model. Users appreciate its affordable price, good snow traction and high mileage. However, it tends to lack side grip on snow and offers little leeway when it comes to aquaplaning in curves. Its dry braking distance is also longer than some might like (source).


On the other hand, the Continental AllSeasonContact is an all-round tyre manufactured in Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and France. Its strongest features include excellent aquaplaning - cross, dry handling, comfort, and wet circle cornering abilities. Its performance on snow is also highly rated, although it does have a tendency to understeer and its dry braking distance could be shorter. Nevertheless, it has not been replaced by a newer model either.


As for the comparison of their test performance, the Continental tyre has done better overall. In Autoklub ČR tests, it took the 2nd position out of 10 tyres, while the Firestone tyre was 6th. Autobild's tests were even stricter, with 32 tyres participating. Here, the Continental AllSeasonContact still did well, finishing 8th, while the Firestone tyre came a long way down the order, at 26th.


The Autobild 2020 test summary gave both tyres some good reviews. The Continental tyre received praise for its all-round talent, excellent winter qualities, precise steering response, high mileage, and fuel-saving rolling resistance. Critics suggested it understeers and has longer dry braking distances. Meantime, the Firestone tyre was lauded for excellent traction and short braking distances on snow, dynamic wet handling, short dry braking distances and its high mileage. However, it was also criticized for moderate aquaplaning safety reserves.


In conclusion, while both the Firestone Multiseason 2 and Continental AllSeasonContact have their strengths and weaknesses, our tests and those conducted by Autoklub ČR and Autobild indicate the Continental tyre is the superior choice overall.

Test Profile

Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
13
26
24
Best position
#6
#1
#1
Average position
10.9
4.2
2.7
Latest test
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
61
100
151

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
63%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Wet Braking
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Wet Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
54%
Continental AllSeasonContact
59%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Wet Circle Cornering
Firestone Multiseason 2
78%
Continental AllSeasonContact
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Aquaplaning Cross
Firestone Multiseason 2
44%
Continental AllSeasonContact
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Dry Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
70%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact
71%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Dry Braking
Firestone Multiseason 2
63%
Continental AllSeasonContact
63%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
97%
Dry Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
86%
Snow Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact
90%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Michelin CrossClimate 2
91%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Snow Braking
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Continental AllSeasonContact
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Snow Traction
Firestone Multiseason 2
83%
Continental AllSeasonContact
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
97%
Snow Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
83%
Continental AllSeasonContact
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Snow Circle Cornering
Firestone Multiseason 2
62%
Continental AllSeasonContact
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
91%
Comfort & Noise
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Noise Exterior
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Continental AllSeasonContact
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Ride Comfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
67%
Continental AllSeasonContact
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
80%
Economy
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact
64%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Michelin CrossClimate 2
70%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Rolling Resistance
Firestone Multiseason 2
67%
Continental AllSeasonContact
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Mileage
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Continental AllSeasonContact
56%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
56%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
Autoklub ČRAutoklub ČR
All season
2022205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2022195/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2021225/50 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison