18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data


Let's take a closer look at two all-round tyres manufactured by respected brands, the Firestone Multiseason 2 and the Continental AllSeasonContact. Both were appreciated by various reviewers, but their ratings in our own tests were quite different, with the Firestone tyre scoring 63% and the Continental one 75%.


Made in Italy, the Firestone Multiseason 2 is a winter tyre that has not been superseded by a newer model. Users appreciate its affordable price, good snow traction and high mileage. However, it tends to lack side grip on snow and offers little leeway when it comes to aquaplaning in curves. Its dry braking distance is also longer than some might like (source).


On the other hand, the Continental AllSeasonContact is an all-round tyre manufactured in Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and France. Its strongest features include excellent aquaplaning - cross, dry handling, comfort, and wet circle cornering abilities. Its performance on snow is also highly rated, although it does have a tendency to understeer and its dry braking distance could be shorter. Nevertheless, it has not been replaced by a newer model either.


As for the comparison of their test performance, the Continental tyre has done better overall. In Autoklub ČR tests, it took the 2nd position out of 10 tyres, while the Firestone tyre was 6th. Autobild's tests were even stricter, with 32 tyres participating. Here, the Continental AllSeasonContact still did well, finishing 8th, while the Firestone tyre came a long way down the order, at 26th.


The Autobild 2020 test summary gave both tyres some good reviews. The Continental tyre received praise for its all-round talent, excellent winter qualities, precise steering response, high mileage, and fuel-saving rolling resistance. Critics suggested it understeers and has longer dry braking distances. Meantime, the Firestone tyre was lauded for excellent traction and short braking distances on snow, dynamic wet handling, short dry braking distances and its high mileage. However, it was also criticized for moderate aquaplaning safety reserves.


In conclusion, while both the Firestone Multiseason 2 and Continental AllSeasonContact have their strengths and weaknesses, our tests and those conducted by Autoklub ČR and Autobild indicate the Continental tyre is the superior choice overall.

Test Profile

Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Number of tests
13
26
9
Best position
#6
#1
#5
Average position
10.9
4.2
10.8
Latest test
2025
2024
2023
Available sizes
61
100
73

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
63%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact
76%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Wet Braking
Firestone Multiseason 2
70%
Continental AllSeasonContact
75%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
Wet Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Continental AllSeasonContact
74%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%
Wet Circle Cornering
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Continental AllSeasonContact
82%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
73%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Firestone Multiseason 2
55%
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%
Aquaplaning Cross
Firestone Multiseason 2
49%
Continental AllSeasonContact
74%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
66%
Dry Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
69%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact
65%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Dry Braking
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Continental AllSeasonContact
58%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
60%
Dry Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Continental AllSeasonContact
72%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
74%
Snow Performance
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact
89%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
75%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Snow Braking
Firestone Multiseason 2
84%
Continental AllSeasonContact
90%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
87%
Snow Traction
Firestone Multiseason 2
84%
Continental AllSeasonContact
84%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
75%
Snow Handling
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Continental AllSeasonContact
85%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
74%
Snow Circle Cornering
Firestone Multiseason 2
61%
Continental AllSeasonContact
95%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%
Comfort & Noise
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
73%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Noise Exterior
Firestone Multiseason 2
69%
Continental AllSeasonContact
72%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
79%
Ride Comfort
Firestone Multiseason 2
67%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Economy
Firestone Multiseason 2
78%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Continental AllSeasonContact
75%
Continental
AllSeasonContact
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Rolling Resistance
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Continental AllSeasonContact
84%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Mileage
Firestone Multiseason 2
81%
Continental AllSeasonContact
65%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
All season
2022195/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2021225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2020205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison