18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Firehawk Sport vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Firestone
Firehawk Sport
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
6
3
15
Best position
#4
#2
#2
Average position
10.7
3.3
9.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
34
60
225

Wet

Wet
Firestone Firehawk Sport
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet handling
Firestone Firehawk Sport
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Firehawk Sport
58%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Firehawk Sport
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Firestone Firehawk Sport
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Firehawk Sport
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Firehawk Sport
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry handling
Firestone Firehawk Sport
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry braking
Firestone Firehawk Sport
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Firehawk Sport
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Comfort
Firestone Firehawk Sport
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Exterior noise
Firestone Firehawk Sport
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Firehawk Sport
98%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Firehawk Sport
98%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2025225/40 R18View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison