18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Firehawk Sport vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Firestone
Firehawk Sport
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
6
3
26
Best position
#4
#2
#1
Average position
10.7
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
34
34
66

Wet

Wet
Firestone Firehawk Sport
64%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Firestone Firehawk Sport
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Firehawk Sport
58%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Firehawk Sport
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Firestone Firehawk Sport
71%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Firehawk Sport
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Firehawk Sport
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Firestone Firehawk Sport
74%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry braking
Firestone Firehawk Sport
79%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry lane changing
Firestone Firehawk Sport
81%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
Firestone Firehawk Sport
81%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Firehawk Sport
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Comfort
Firestone Firehawk Sport
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Exterior noise
Firestone Firehawk Sport
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Firehawk Sport
98%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Firehawk Sport
98%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison