18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Firehawk Sport vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Firestone
Firehawk Sport
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
26
3
Best position
#4
#1
#2
Average position
10.7
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
34
66
34

Wet

Wet
Firestone Firehawk Sport
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Firehawk Sport
58%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Firehawk Sport
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Firestone Firehawk Sport
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Firestone Firehawk Sport
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Firehawk Sport
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Firehawk Sport
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Firestone Firehawk Sport
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Firestone Firehawk Sport
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry lane changing
Firestone Firehawk Sport
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Firestone Firehawk Sport
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Firehawk Sport
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Firestone Firehawk Sport
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Firehawk Sport
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Firehawk Sport
98%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Firehawk Sport
98%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison