Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Number of tests

4

10

3

18

Best position

#7

#2

#1

Average position

12.3

6.0

3.7

6.1

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

2024

Available sizes

103

109

36

47

Wet

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter HS02

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Wet side guide

Falken EuroWinter HS02

33%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Dry handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Dry lane changing

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter HS02

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

50%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter HS02

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter HS02

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Tyres for EV cars Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Falken e.Ziex vs Maxxis Premitra AS AP3

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Browse by brand

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

EuroWinter HS02

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison