18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS02
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Number of tests
4
23
14
3
Best position
#7
#1
#1
#4
Average position
12.3
6.7
3.6
4.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
103
107
194
99

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken EuroWinter HS02
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Wet braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken EuroWinter HS02
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Wet handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02
61%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Wet circle cornering
Falken EuroWinter HS02
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Snow
Confidence
Falken EuroWinter HS02
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Snow traction
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Snow braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Snow handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02
57%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Lateral guidance on snow
Falken EuroWinter HS02
33%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%
Dry
Confidence
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Dry braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Dry handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Dry lane changing
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry steering response
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Comfort
Confidence
Falken EuroWinter HS02
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Exterior noise
Falken EuroWinter HS02
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Comfort
Falken EuroWinter HS02
50%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Costs
Confidence
Falken EuroWinter HS02
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Mileage
Falken EuroWinter HS02
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store