Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Number of tests

13

10

4

3

14

Best position

#7

#2

#1

Average position

11.9

6.0

3.3

3.7

3.6

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

82

109

40

36

194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

58%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Wet performance

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Wet side guide

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

52%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Snow traction

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Snow braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

80%

Snow handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

27%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

73%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

61%

Dry handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dry lane changing

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Dry steering response

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Dry performance

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

71%

Rolling resistance

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

54%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

41%

Price/value

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Offroad

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Michelin Primacy 4+

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Continental PremiumContact 7

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Browse by brand

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

EuroWinter HS02 Pro

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison