Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Falken (58%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has a better rating of 91% compared to 55% of the Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro. The first tyre test of Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro was done in 2023, compared to 2024 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the EuroWinter HS02 Pro and the Blizzak 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Satisfactory
2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro Rating: Sufficient | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro | 35.8 | 29.5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | 35.0 | 28.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 7.3 | 7.3 | 6.4 | 7.0 | 6.0 | ||
| Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro Rating: Good | 7.5 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 7.7 | 7.0 | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Very good | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 7.7 | 6.5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||