18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test Profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Number of tests
13
23
29
Best position
#7
#1
#1
Average position
11.9
6.7
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
82
107
180

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Wet Braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
63%
Wet Handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Wet Circle Cornering
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Aquaplaning Cross
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
57%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Dry Performance
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
81%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Dry Braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%
Dry Handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Snow Performance
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
52%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
94%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Snow Braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Snow Traction
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Snow Handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
46%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Snow Circle Cornering
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
53%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%
Comfort & Noise
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
73%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Noise Exterior
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Ride Comfort
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Economy
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
48%
Falken
EuroWinter HS02 Pro
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Rolling Resistance
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
42%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Mileage
Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
54%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2025225/40 R18View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2023225/45 R18View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison