Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2

Wet performance tilts decisively toward the Hankook. In their shared Autobild 2020 test across 50 tyres in 245/45 R18, the Hankook recorded a wet braking distance of 32.3m against the Falken's 37m — a gap of nearly 5 metres that has real safety implications. The Hankook's wet braking score of 78.2 also edges the Falken's 77.1 across broader measured data. Aquaplaning is more of a split verdict: the Falken shows stronger longitudinal aquaplaning resistance (89 vs Hankook's 84.6 in detail scores), while the Hankook pulls ahead in crosswind aquaplaning (87.1 vs 79.3). Both carry a B EU wet grip label. The Falken's weaker lateral grip on wet roads was flagged across multiple test seasons, and some testers noted that it understeers at the limit in wet corners. The Hankook is the safer, more capable wet tyre overall, particularly once you factor in its shorter stopping distances.

On dry roads, the picture is more nuanced than headline scores suggest. The Falken HS01 posts a higher dry braking score of 77.4 versus the Hankook's 66.9, and testers noted its safe, predictably understeering dynamics on dry asphalt — stable and composed if not particularly exciting. The Hankook, despite its lower dry braking metric, earned praise for secure and precise dry-road behaviour in 2025 ADAC testing, with handling described as measured and confidence-inspiring. Where the Hankook catches criticism is response and stopping bite — some testers flagged lazy initial turn-in and slightly extended dry braking distances in back-to-back comparisons. For pure dry braking, the Falken holds an edge, but in overall dry-condition balance across tests, neither tyre distinguishes itself as a truly sporty handler. Both are honest winter touring tyres on tarmac, built for safety rather than engagement.

Snow is where the gap between these two opens up most clearly. The Hankook's snow score of 78.7 versus the Falken's 72.2 reflects a genuine performance difference rooted in design philosophy — the W330's unidirectional tread with gull-wing grooves and its proprietary High 3-Grip sipe technology were engineered specifically for traction on snow, slush, and ice. In the shared 2020 test, Hankook stopped from speed in 25m on snow against the Falken's 27m, and in snow handling tests the Hankook's measured score of 100 placed it among the best in its category, praised for outstanding balance, good cornering grip, and generous reserves. The Falken isn't incompetent — real owners consistently praise its snow and wet grip for the money, and one early review described it as rivalling a premium tyre for grip on snow and ice — but it drew specific deductions for long snow braking distances and sluggish steering response on winter surfaces, weaknesses the Hankook simply doesn't share to the same degree.

Comfort is the one area where the Falken genuinely holds its own or pulls ahead. Its noise score of 76.7 comfortably outclasses the Hankook's 62.1 — rolling noise is a consistent complaint against the W330 across ADAC, AutoBild, and Sportauto testing, with pass-by noise flagged as a notable weakness. Owner feedback on the HS01 tells a similar story from the other side: real-world buyers highlight low noise as a genuine positive, with one owner noting that keeping inflation below 2.2 bar keeps the tyre quiet even at motorway speeds. On rolling resistance, the Hankook wins convincingly with a score of 70.8 versus the Falken's 47.3 — the HS01's high rolling resistance was called out by multiple testers and is a real fuel-economy penalty. Projected mileage is an interesting split: the Falken scores 72.7 on wear prediction, while ADAC's 2025 testing actually rated the Hankook as delivering very high tyre life with low measurable abrasion — a finding that its headline mileage score doesn't fully reflect. For drivers who value a quiet cabin, the Falken is meaningfully the better choice.