18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2

The Falken Azenis FK510 and Continental PremiumContact 6 are both premium summer tyres that offer good performance with a few differences that set them apart.


The Falken Azenis FK510, made in Japan and Turkey, is widely lauded for its comfort, exterior noise levels and price-to-value ratio. According to tests at AutoBild where it ranked 3rd out of 52 tyres, notable features include its rolling resistance and grip in wet and dry conditions. However, it exhibits deficits in aquaplaning and brake balance in dry conditions, making it more suitable for less dynamically demanding vehicles.


On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 6, manufactured in Slovakia, Germany and the Czech Republic, shines in dry conditions with short braking distances and stable handling. Ranking 1st in the AutoBild test, it also boasts of a good price-to-value ratio and fuel-efficient rolling resistance. Notable shortcomings include slowed steering response and extended braking distance on wet surfaces.


In mutual test positions, the Falken Azenis FK510 outmatched the Continental PremiumContact 6 in the GTÜ and Autozeitung tests, but fell short in tests conducted by the AutoMotorSport and ADAC. Both tyres performed equally in a test by EVO magazine.


The Falken Azenis FK510 has recently been replaced with the newer Falken Azenis FK520, whereas Continental PremiumContact 6 has been succeeded by the Continental PremiumContact 7.


Overall, if prioritizing comfort and value, the Falken Azenis FK510 seems to be a reliable choice. However, for those desiring a tyre optimised for dry conditions and efficiency, Continental PremiumContact 6 would be more suitable.


For more details about the manufacturers, visit the website of Falken and Continental.

Test Profile

Falken
Azenis FK510
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Fulda
SportControl 2
Yokohama
Advan Fleva V701
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
Number of tests
29
36
16
4
15
Best position
#1
#1
#3
#14
#2
Average position
5.4
3.1
11.7
16.0
13.3
Latest test
2022
2023
2026
2019
2026
Available sizes
125
296
91
49
76

Wet

Wet
Falken Azenis FK510
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Fulda SportControl 2
76%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
84%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken Azenis FK510
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Fulda SportControl 2
80%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
85%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
78%
Wet handling
Falken Azenis FK510
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Fulda SportControl 2
72%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
88%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
66%
Wet braking
Falken Azenis FK510
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Fulda SportControl 2
60%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
67%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Fulda SportControl 2
86%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
80%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
84%
Wet circle cornering
Falken Azenis FK510
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Fulda SportControl 2
73%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
73%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
Wet side guide
Falken Azenis FK510
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Fulda SportControl 2
71%
Wet performance
Falken Azenis FK510
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Falken Azenis FK510
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Fulda SportControl 2
79%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
96%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
85%
Dry braking
Falken Azenis FK510
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Fulda SportControl 2
75%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
82%
Dry handling
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Fulda SportControl 2
74%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
96%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
80%
Dry lane changing
Falken Azenis FK510
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Dry steering response
Falken Azenis FK510
55%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Dry driving behavior
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
86%
Dry performance
Falken Azenis FK510
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
85%

Costs

Costs
Falken Azenis FK510
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Fulda SportControl 2
72%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
62%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
Rolling resistance
Falken Azenis FK510
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Fulda SportControl 2
80%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
69%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
74%
Mileage
Falken Azenis FK510
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Fulda SportControl 2
57%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
60%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
72%
Price/value
Falken Azenis FK510
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Fulda SportControl 2
68%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
35%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
88%
Fuel efficiency
Falken Azenis FK510
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Fulda SportControl 2
74%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
95%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
72%
Exterior noise
Falken Azenis FK510
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Fulda SportControl 2
77%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
95%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
Comfort
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Fulda SportControl 2
81%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
76%
Interior noise
Falken Azenis FK510
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Fulda SportControl 2
71%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2017225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2017225/50 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison