Segment
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Matador (40%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winter Sport 5 and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 59% of Dunlop Winter Sport 5 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C rating.
| # | Dunlop Winter Sport 5
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
7
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 33,6 | 27,3 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 37,4 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 32,9 | 24,3 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 34,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1- | |||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2- | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 34,8 | 28,1 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 36,6 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 33,6 | 27,6 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 38,4 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 | 36,1 | 25,5 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 40,6 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: - | 2,4 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: - | 3,7 | 2,6 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | |||||||
