Segment
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Premium
Comparison: Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Hankook (83%). Important for this comparison is also the Sportscars 2017 225/40 R18 test, where both the Winter Sport 5 and the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 59% of Dunlop Winter Sport 5 has B wet grip rating, whereas 85% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C rating.
| # | Dunlop Winter Sport 5
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R21 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Exemplary2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Dunlop Winter Sport 5 72 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,2 | 9,9 | 10 | |||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Recommended | 8,9 | 8,5 | 8,9 | 7,3 | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Still recommended | 6,8 | 8,3 | 8,1 | 7,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2- | 2- | 1- | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: - | 2,4 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: - | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,3 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Dunlop Winter Sport 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: - | 3+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
