18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Debica Presto UHP 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Debica
Presto UHP 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
2
3
15
Best position
#4
#2
#2
Average position
16.0
3.3
9.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
50
60
225

Wet

Wet
Debica Presto UHP 2
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Debica Presto UHP 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet braking
Debica Presto UHP 2
44%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Debica Presto UHP 2
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet circle cornering
Debica Presto UHP 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
Debica Presto UHP 2
45%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Debica Presto UHP 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Debica Presto UHP 2
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
Debica Presto UHP 2
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Dry

Dry
Debica Presto UHP 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Debica Presto UHP 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Debica Presto UHP 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Costs

Costs
Debica Presto UHP 2
50%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
Debica Presto UHP 2
50%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2025225/40 R18View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison